Architectural dialogue

With a total construction area of 192m², the pavilion is strategically positioned adjacent to the house, ensuring direct access to the outdoors while maintaining its connection with the existing residence.

 

Design Philosophy

Its placement allows for seamless integration with the property, providing accessibility without compromising the original structure’s prominence. To achieve a sense of coexistence and balance, the pavilion, along with its access corridor and open terrace, is set half a level below the property’s general access level. This deliberate design choice prevents it from overshadowing the main house while fostering a harmonious architectural dialogue.

The pavilion’s design emerges from an interplay of geometric lines that extend from both the site and the existing residence. Its footprint is a direct response to the spatial and contextual dynamics of the area, carefully shaped by its surroundings. The interior program includes a dining area, bar, lounge, and billiards space, while the outdoor section features a terrace with a barbecue and an amphitheater. The amphitheater also serves as a staircase, providing access to the rear or main garden, as the structure is partially buried within the landscape.

 

 

Context Integration

Respecting the natural environment was a fundamental aspect of the project. The pavilion was designed with minimal intervention in the green area, preserving the existing vegetation and introducing a green roof to enhance sustainability. The architectural concept embraces a timeless aesthetic- understated and refined on the exterior while expressing a dynamic contrast within. Material selection reinforces this duality, with exposed concrete defining the exterior and a carefully curated mix of natural materials shaping the interior.

 

 

Construction Challenges & Materials

Several constraints guided the design process. The pavilion was required to maintain functional autonomy while remaining within a height restriction, ensuring it did not exceed the parapet of the ante-dining room window. Additionally, its relationship with nature was prioritized, with a green oak tree preserved as a central element of the intervention site. A conscious differentiation in form and materials was implemented to acknowledge and respect the architecture of the existing house. The overall materiality was driven by the use of natural and unaltered materials, reinforcing a dialogue between the built environment and the surrounding landscape.